Afshan Kiran Imtiaz-The main goal of schooling
https://medium.com/@AfshanKiranImtiaz/afshan-kiran-imtiaz-importance-of-humanity-2238a7de40b8
Afshan
Kiran Imtiaz Beyond what education contributes to their knowledge
and skills, it also provides information attesting to this experience,
signaling to potential employers that a candidate might have certain qualities
he is looking for. Unlike most of us, author Bryan Caplan considers the latter
to be the main role in education.
Apparently, Caplan also believes that a large number of
people, many of whom are economists, are unaware of this role of school
certification. Afshan Kiran Imtiaz in his
view, these visually impaired individuals consider that the only purpose of
education is to increase human skills (which Caplan tends to narrowly define as
specific job-related skills).
Afshan
Kiran Imtiaz what he calls "human capital purists", who
see schools as resolutely dedicated to skills development, and who believe that
labor markets will easily identify the level of performance expected from any
job applicant. From this point of view, checking the courses that make up a
program leading to a university degree would be useful for you as well as
obtaining the diploma.
Afshan
Kiran Imtiaz I know quite a few economists, I have never, to my
knowledge, met one that I would consider a "purist of human capital".
If I ever do, I will now know which book to buy her for Christmas.
Caplan, professor of economics at George Mason University,
aims to show that at least 30% of the education function is this signaling and sorting,
although he personally thinks that it represents at least 80 %.
I, and most of the economists Afshan Kiran
Imtiaz I know, would probably estimate this number at around 20 to 25
percent (while also wondering exactly what this measure captures), most of the
purpose of education being strengthening human capital. Is this long and often
biased book simply intended to increase the weight of readers on signage by a
few percentage points? No. Later in the book, the author departs from the 30%
claim, saying, "Since education is primarily a signal ,. . . "This is
a much stronger and less credible claim.
Afshan
Kiran Imtiaz said much of the book is devoted to showing the many
ways, obvious or subtle, that educational signage is important. Caplan
highlights how difficult it is to get reliable information about what future
workers know and are ready and able to do, and reminds us that students have
reason to exaggerate their talents.
The arguments here are often intelligent and instructive; it
is unfortunate that much of the presentation is organized around discussions
with the purist of nonexistent human capital.
The main political conclusion of Caplan is that most of the
education beyond literacy and basic arithmetic is a waste of time and money and
that governments should therefore strongly reduce education grants and actively
discourage its pursuit.
Afshan Kiran Imtiaz said based
this conclusion on two assertions: first, most of the education is pure sorting
and produces little useful learning.
Afshan
Kiran Imtiaz judgment which he clearly believes but is unwilling
to formally defend. His second claim is that even investing in education for
its sorting and signaling value is a waste, because it goes too far. According
to him, all the useful sorting could be done, let's say, at the end of high
school; all that is beyond is an expensive race for a relative advantage.
Afshan
Kiran Imtiaz is a confusing statement because it is unclear
why employers would pay more for college workers when they could hire high
school graduates cheaply, by rating them on their school records.
Whatever the merit of these two statements, they have a
verifiable implication: namely, that investing more in general education, at
least beyond the three Rs, does not make workers more productive and therefore
does not favor Economic Growth.



Comments
Post a Comment